From the category archives:

Process

Paul Graham is many things — a writer, computer programmer and language designer, a painter, a venture capitalist. Among other contributions, he suggested the mathematical model used by most email systems to filter spam.

Etherpad is a collaborative, web-based text editing tool. It can also reproduce every change you’ve made to a document. Think of it as infinite undo, an animation that reveals the process of editing, played back frame by frame.

Combining the two:

Watch Paul Graham write a summary of his 13 tips for startup companies — from keystroke #1 to #5465.

[There's no way to embed this one, so you have to click on the link to view it.]

{ 0 comments }

From an article by W.A. Pannapacker, who suggests that procrastination is preferable to “productive mediocrity”:

“But Leonardo rarely completed any of the great projects that he sketched in his notebooks. His groundbreaking research in human anatomy resulted in no publications — at least not in his lifetime. Not only did Leonardo fail to realize his potential as an engineer and a scientist, but he also spent his career hounded by creditors to whom he owed paintings and sculptures for which he had accepted payment but — for some reason — could not deliver, even when his deadline was extended by years. His surviving paintings amount to no more than 20, and five or six, including the “Mona Lisa,” were still in his possession when he died. Apparently, he was still tinkering with them.”

{ 0 comments }

Gem Tactics

February 24, 2009

in Learning,Poetry,Process

Emily Dickinson:

#320

We play at Paste –
Till qualified, for Pearl –
Then, drop the Paste –
And deem ourself a fool –

The Shapes — though — were similar –
And our new Hands
Learned Gem-Tactics –
Practicing Sands

{ 0 comments }

Crystal Chair

Crystal Chair

On growing a chair:

If there’s one profession that’s given license to indulge in control-freakery, it’s design. Why, then, did the Japanese industrial designer Tokujin Yoshioka leave it up to nature to decide how one of his new products, a chair, would turn out?

{ 0 comments }

75 Years

February 15, 2009

in Process,Storytelling,Video

The Hungarian government featured drawings by Eva Zeisel as part of America’s sesquicentennial celebration in 1926.

This video was recorded in 2001, when she was 95 years old:

A few choice quotes:

“…I’m doing my work like I always did…”
“…I call myself a maker of things…”
“…novelty is a concept of commerce not an aesthetic concept…”
“…we are actually concerned with a playful search for beauty…”
“…I made the things — particularly — because I wanted to use them to see the world…”

{ 0 comments }

Last month, Paula Wellings of Adaptive Path resolved to slow down:

In the past few years, I’ve migrated from being a hardcore book and research reader to avidly surfing a rather random collection of online articles, mailing lists, blogs, Facebook updates, and tweets. My writing has followed almost the same trajectory. While there is certainly something compelling about the immediacy of an online conversation and the ability to flit about like at a cocktail party, I often leave reading the web with only a vague idea of what I’ve read. It’s less like I’m reading broadly and more like I’m nibbling on a delicious collection of non-sequiturs.

For 2009, I am resolving to explore what might be considered slow food for thought, including:

  • Bringing synthesis and reflection to my miscellaneous web snacking activities or curtailing them.
  • Endeavoring to read excellent books and articles that people spent months and years thinking through and crafting into being.
  • Committing to writing texts that are longer than 140 characters and address more than what I’m doing right now.

Reading this got me thinking about how the dimension of time relates to size in the thoughts I explored in my post on brevity last month. The profound can arrive in tiny packages. And the mundane can be enormous.

What makes a book or a film or a symphony or even a small form like a haiku or a minuet profound is the synthesis and reflection that Paula mentions, the depth of gathered experiences that we and the artist each bring to it, and the attention to absorb every nuance of the moment in which we encounter the idea.

In other words, it’s not that Twitter or Facebook or text messages are so frequently banal because they are ‘small’ forms: it’s that they so often lack reflection, contemplation, synthesis, history — and our full attention. But there’s nothing inherent in small forms that prevents us from intensifying them through such means.

{ 0 comments }

Routines

February 6, 2009

in Process

The Daily Routines blog curates accounts of the patterns creative people keep in their daily lives.

From the rigor of Anthony Trollope:

Every day for years, Trollope reported in his “Autobiography,” he woke in darkness and wrote from 5:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m., with his watch in front of him. He required of himself two hundred and fifty words every quarter of an hour. If he finished one novel before eight-thirty, he took out a fresh piece of paper and started the next. The writing session was followed, for a long stretch of time, by a day job with the postal service. Plus, he said, he always hunted at least twice a week. Under this regimen, he produced forty-nine novels in thirty-five years.

To James Thurber’s constant scribbling:

I never quite know when I’m not writing. Sometimes my wife comes up to me at a party and says, “Dammit, Thurber, stop writing.” She usually catches me in the middle of a paragraph. Or my daughter will look up from the dinner table and ask, “Is he sick?” “No,” my wife says, “he’s writing something.”

Joseph Campbell divided the day into four sections of four hours each, and devoted nine hours to reading:

So during the years of the Depression I had arranged a schedule for myself. When you don’t have a job or anyone to tell you what to do, you’ve got to fix one for yourself. I divided the day into four four-hour periods, of which I would be reading in three of the four-hour periods, and free one of them.

Orhan Pamuk explains why he must live and write in different spaces, or at least pretend to:

I have always thought that the place where you sleep or the place you share with your partner should be separate from the place where you write. The domestic rituals and details somehow kill the imagination. They kill the demon in me. The domestic, tame daily routine makes the longing for the other world, which the imagination needs to operate, fade away. So for years I always had an office or a little place outside the house to work in. I always had different flats. But once I spent half a semester in the U.S. while my ex-wife was taking her Ph.D. at Columbia University. We were living in an apartment for married students and didn’t have any space, so I had to sleep and write in the same place. Reminders of family life were all around. This upset me. In the mornings I used to say goodbye to my wife like someone going to work. I’d leave the house, walk around a few blocks, and come back like a person arriving at the office.

There is even a category for night owls, such as Joyce Carol Oates:

I try to write in the morning very intensely, from 8:30 to 1 p.m. When I’m traveling, I can work from 10 p.m. to 3 a.m. Alone, I don’t sleep that well. I get a lot of work done in hotel rooms. The one solace for loneliness is work. I hand write and then I type. I don’t have a word processor. I write slowly.

This report of the start-stop sounds of E.B. White at the typewriter is a reminder that having a routine doesn’t mean that progress is smooth or steady:

The first writer I watched at work was my stepfather, E.B. White. Each Tuesday morning, he would close his study door and sit down to write the “Notes and Comment” page for The New Yorker. The task was familiar to him–he was required to file a few hundred words of editorial or personal commentary on some topic in or out of the news that week–but the sounds of his typewriter from his room came in hesitant bursts, with long silences in between. Hours went by. Summoned at last for lunch, he was silent and preoccupied, and soon excused himself to get back to the job. When the copy went off at last, in the afternoon RFD pouch–we were in Maine, a day’s mail away from New York–he rarely seemed satisfied. “It isn’t good enough,” he said sometimes. “I wish it were better.”

{ 0 comments }

Cut and Paste

January 30, 2009

in History,Process,Words

In a NY Times review of two new biographies of Samuel Johnson, Leah Price offers this description of Johnson’s dictionary project:

When a syndicate of booksellers commissioned Johnson to edit an English dictionary, his first task was to assemble a team of collaborators, including one who specialized in “all words relating to gambling and card-playing.” In a kind of assembly line improvised in Johnson’s attic, they scanned printed books for quotations, copied passages onto a new sheet (or sometimes scissored up the original), cut the sheets into slips, sorted them alphabetically and glued them into a double-columned notebook. Martin speculates that Johnson’s task would have been easi­er if he’d had a word processor; the real tragedy was that the index card wasn’t yet invented. Drowning in slips that had gotten unglued, lost or reshuffled, at the end of five years Johnson had yet to reach D. When the Dictionary finally appeared in 1755, its two volumes weighed in at 2,500 pages. The entry for “dull” was illustrated with the sentence “To make dictionaries is dull work.”

{ 0 comments }

Another Girl At Play features “Women Entrepreneurs Sharing Stories of How They Made Their Creative Dreams Real”.

Lorena Siminovich’s words of advice for those pursuing their creative goals:

Be original. Don’t procrastinate. Set goals. Make a website. Tell others. Ask for help. Truly believe in what you do, and don’t undersell yourself, even if you are just starting. Ah, and the most important one, which I’m still working on: Learn to say no.

Laurie Wagner on returning to writing:

At one point in 1990 I quit writing because I didn’t think I had what it took to be a writer. I didn’t think I was talented enough. I wanted to be a cog, I wanted a paycheck and I didn’t want to have to self-generate. So I went and worked for the massive publisher, Simon and Schuster. I traveled and sold books for them for three years and learned a ton about the book business.

I also learned that I was more artist than salesperson and if I didn’t quit the corporate gig I was going to die. I realized that I had judged my own talent so harshly and that wasn’t fair. It didn’t matter whether I would be successful or not, what mattered was that I gave myself a chance to express myself.

Andrea Scher’s words of advice for those pursuing their creative goals:

Don’t be afraid to make mistakes. There is no way to know everything about your creative endeavor until you start doing it. Don’t wait, thinking that you’ll start when you know what you’re doing. This will only paralyze you and keep you from ever beginning it.

Read more at Another Girl At Play.

{ 0 comments }

After watching his TED lecture:

I’ve been thinking about John Maeda’s Laws for Simplicity.

They are more tips than laws, actually.  For example:

Law 3: Savings in time feel like simplicity.

Though Maeda works in technology and design, these could work for other fields.

And here’s a thought experiment: substitute clarity for simplicity, and read through the list again.

{ 0 comments }

Enacting Verbs

January 10, 2009

in Process,Words

Calvin Tomkins, on how Richard Serra began as a sculptor:

Serra, the former English major, wrote down a list of verbs: “To roll, to crease, to fold, to bend, to twist” — dozens of active verbs. “I was very involved with the physical activity of making,” he said. “It struck me that instead of thinking about what a sculpture is going to be and how you’re going to do it compositionally, what if you just enacted those verbs in relation to a material and didn’t worry about the result? So I started tearing and cutting and folding lead.”

{ 0 comments }